Reference:

By Rabin, R.C. Published: (2010 August, 24).

From: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/24/science/24breast.html .

Summary:

     this article talked about radiation and the risks to a woman's breast. The physicians had to have tests for breast imaging. There are some doctors who objected to the tests with high radiation because it can cause canser. There is also, a study figuredout states that some of the tests that lead to inject radiation material into patient which expose much more radiation for wemon than common mammography well increas the risk of cancer in other week organs. There is a belief that the use of imagin technology well be available around the world and natural.

Reaction:

     my reaction to what I have read hs that, there are some good doctors want to develop screening technologies. I think that they are on the right way to do it. I feel that they well attain exceptional progress in screening technologies and the tests they are doing. Although, they do not understand it well, but my feelings toward them as well as people must do in order to courage them. In my opinion, physicians should pay more attention to the amount of radiation on wemon breasts to avoid cancer. A good quote is “They’re treating all the tests as if they have the same radiation dose and risk as mammography, and the truth is they have a much, much higher risk. The point of the paper was to say that not all the breast imaging procedures have comparable risks and doses” Dr. Hendrick said. In addition, all the studies were still going on so far, in order to fiend a cure to wemon breasts without harming them. In conclusion, we all hope for physicians to develop screen technology and also to make their treatment without harmful effects on a woman's breasts.